PROCUREMENT – TRADITIONAL CONTRACT
In construction procurement means “the process of acquiring the materials and services to complete the project”.
The three most common procurement routes are: traditional, design and build and construction management.
Each has advantages and disadvantages. Selecting the best procurement route depends on the client’s objectives in relation to time, cost and quality.
MAIN FEATURES
Different parties are appointed to be responsible for the design and construction.
The design is completed by an architect acting for the client. The contractor is usually appointed through a competitive tender process or negotiation.
The contractor is responsible for managing and coordinating the construction process including any specialist sub-contractors.
The Quantity Surveyor role is to work with both the architect and contractor so that the completed project meets the client’s objectives.
Following the traditional procurement route means full design documents need to be prepared prior to the tender. The separation of the design process from construction can increase the overall time to completion of the project. However, there is reasonable price certainty as the contract sum is usually known at the end of the design process.
The traditional approach is suitable for inexperienced clients or occasional construction clients where time is not of the essence.
WHY CHOOSE THE TRADITIONAL CONTRACT ROUTE?
- Well established and familiar process for all parties
- Quality is usually at forefront of project with architect appointed as lead consultant to certify contractor’s work.
- Tender process leads to competitive pricing and value for money.
- The client’s team is responsible for design risk rather than the contractor
- Client has control over design and quality through the professional team
POSSIBLE DISADVANTAGES
- Construction will only start on site on completion of design and tender process
- Can take longer as the design is completed before construction begins
